Position a product brand by making 4 decisions in writing before any design: who the product is for, what it stands against, what it will be called, and what it must never say. Then check every claim the position rests on, because UK advertising rules ask for documentary evidence of objective claims before they are published.
Positioning is 4 decisions, made in order
A buyer standing in front of 6 similar products, or scrolling past them on a marketplace, needs 1 reason to pick yours. Positioning is the work of deciding that reason before anyone draws a mark, so that the pack, the product page and the sales deck all give the same one.
Our brand strategy and visual identity page puts it in 1 line: “Strategy here means four decisions made in order.” The 4 are listed on the same page:
- Who the product is for.
- What it stands against.
- What it will be called.
- What it must never say.
The order matters. A name chosen before the audience is settled may not fit it, and a claim chosen before the boundaries are written down tends to drift into territory the brand cannot support. The same page describes what the decisions do: “The four decisions fix the boundaries a designer works inside, and a brand that already has its answers starts from them.”
None of the 4 is a slogan. Each is a sentence the team can be held to, written in a document that exists before the first sketch. The rest of this article takes them 1 at a time, with the evidence and the checks each one needs.
Who the product is for, and what they compare it with
The first decision is narrower than a target market. It names the buyer and, just as important, the products that buyer will compare yours with. A protein snack bought by someone training 5 days a week sits next to different alternatives than the same snack bought as a lunch replacement, and the comparison set decides what counts as different.
Write down 3 things. The buyer, in 1 sentence that a new team member could repeat. The moment of choice, which is usually a shelf, a product listing or a recommendation. And the 3 to 5 products the buyer is most likely to weigh against yours at that moment.
That last list is the one that makes the rest of the work testable. A position is a claim about difference, and a difference only exists relative to something. If the comparison set is vague, the position will be vague too.
Our guide to what a brand identity project includes explains why this stage comes first: “The first deliverables are written, not drawn.” On the services list it describes, the first 5 items are strategy, and the mark comes sixth.
What it stands against: pick a difference you can prove
The second decision is the difference itself: what the brand stands for, and therefore what it stands against in that comparison set. The useful test is whether the difference can be shown, not only said.
In the UK, the CAP Code section 3 on misleading advertising sets the frame for claims of this kind. Its comparisons principle says: “The ASA will consider unqualified superlative claims as comparative claims against all competing products.” It continues: “Superiority claims must be supported by evidence unless they are obvious puffery (that is, claims that consumers are unlikely to take literally).”
Rule 3.7 sets the timing: “Before distributing or submitting a marketing communication for publication, marketers must hold documentary evidence to prove claims that consumers are likely to regard as objective and that are capable of objective substantiation.”
For positioning, this sorts candidate differences into 2 groups. Some are objective (a measured property, a sourcing fact, a format) and need evidence on file before the first pack is printed. Others are a point of view (a tone, a design stance, a belief about how the category should behave) and do not depend on a measurement. A strong position usually combines 1 of each: a stance the brand chooses, and a fact that makes the stance credible.
Comparing with named rivals has its own rules
Some brands position directly against a named competitor. That route is open, but the CAP Code adds specific conditions. Rule 3.32 says a comparison with an identifiable competitor “must not mislead, or be likely to mislead, the consumer about either the advertised product or the competing product.” Rule 3.33 adds that such comparisons “must compare products meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose.”
Rule 3.34 asks for a fair basis: they “must objectively compare one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative feature of those products, which may include price.” Rule 3.41 sets the tone limit: a comparison with an identifiable competitor “must not discredit or denigrate another product, marketer, trade mark, trade name or other distinguishing mark.”
In practice, a position does not need a named rival to work, and it is sturdier without one: a position built on 1 competitor has to be rebuilt when that competitor changes, while a brand that states what it does lets the comparison set do the rest. If a direct comparison is part of the plan, it belongs in the claims list with its evidence and its review, not in the identity.
These rules come from UK advertising regulation. Other markets have their own; if the brand sells in more than 1 country, the claims list is checked against each one.
What it will be called: a name that can be protected
The third decision is the name, and it sits in the strategy stage for a reason. A name that only describes the product is hard to own, and a position nobody can own is easy to copy.
The US Patent and Trademark Office’s page on what a trademark is describes a trademark as what lets customers “recognize you in the marketplace and distinguish you from your competitors.” The same page names a common error: “Another common misconception is believing that choosing a trademark that merely describes your goods or services is effective. Creative and unique trademarks are more effective and easier to protect.”
In the UK, GOV.UK’s guide to registering a trade mark states that you can register “to protect your brand, for example the name of your product or service.” It also sets the territory: “Registering a trade mark in the UK only protects your brand in the UK and the Isle of Man.” Before choosing, the government’s trade mark search lets you “check if a similar trade mark to your brand already exists in the UK”.
A candidate name therefore passes 3 checks before it reaches design: it fits the buyer and the stance, it does more than describe the product, and a search in each target market does not turn up a similar mark. Whether a name can be registered is a question for a trade mark professional; the search narrows the list before that conversation.
What it must never say
The fourth decision is the boundary. It lists the claims, words and associations the brand will not use, even when they would sell in the short term. This is the decision that keeps a position stable when a new product, a new campaign or a new market arrives.
Part of the list comes from regulation. The CAP Code’s rule 3.1 is the starting point: “Marketing communications must not materially mislead or be likely to do so.” Rule 3.3 adds that they “must not omit material information or information required to be included by law.” In regulated categories such as food supplements, the list also includes claim types the category rules restrict, and our guide to supplement label compliance covers that side for packaging.
The rest comes from the position itself. A brand that stands for restraint does not use loud promotional language on its packs. A brand built on a precise sourcing fact does not borrow vague category words that every competitor uses. Writing these down turns taste into a rule a copywriter, a marketplace manager or a sales team can apply without asking.
Keep the list short enough to remember, around 5 to 10 lines, and attach it to the brand guidelines so it travels with the identity.
Turning the position into a pack and a page
A written position only works when the buyer can see it at the moment of choice. That is where the identity system takes over, and where the 4 decisions become type, colour, layout and reading order.
For AKME Performance, a sports nutrition brand, the case study names its organising idea in 3 words, “Discipline over motivation”, and states that it “became the organising idea behind the design.” The position shows up in the system as a rule for the pack: “Packaging follows a consistent reading order: brand, product name and supporting information.” The same page describes how the range stays distinguishable: “Matte-black surfaces unify the range, while fine colour accents distinguish products across tubs, bottles and pouches.”
For Rauph, a perfume house, the order of work is written into the case study: “The process began with defining a clear brand positioning.” Its stance was restraint, and the page records how that decision guided the rest: “Brand tone, verbal expression, and overall direction were established early and guided all design decisions throughout the project.”
A useful check before launch takes 2 steps. Put the pack, or the product page, next to the 3 to 5 products from the comparison set. Then ask someone who has not seen the brief which product is different and why. If their answer matches the written position, the system carries it. The table after this section collects the test for each decision.
| Decision | Write down | Test before design |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is for | The buyer in 1 sentence, the moment of choice, 3 to 5 products in the comparison set | A new team member can repeat it |
| What it stands against | 1 stance and 1 provable fact | Evidence for every objective claim is on file |
| What it will be called | A shortlist of names | Not merely descriptive; no similar mark in each target market’s search |
| What it must never say | 5 to 10 lines of excluded claims and words | A copywriter can apply it without asking |
| The system | Type, colour, layout and reading order | A stranger picks the product out of the comparison set for the written reason |
How MarkaWorks works on positioning
MarkaWorks is a branding agency for product brands, and positioning is the first stage of our identity work rather than a separate exercise. Our service page describes the method: “We run market positioning and competitor analysis to set those boundaries, then write them down as a differentiation frame the client can hold us to.”
The frame can stand on its own. The same page answers the question directly: “Positioning, naming and the differentiation frame can be delivered on their own, and some clients take that stage first and decide on the identity later.” When a brand takes both stages, the identity inherits the frame instead of guessing at it.
If the brand already exists and the position needs to move, for example towards a higher price point, the work starts from what customers already recognise; our article on repositioning a brand for a higher price point covers that case. When you are choosing who should do the work, our guide to comparing branding proposals beyond the price shows how to read a proposal’s strategy stage. To talk through your own comparison set and the 4 decisions, start from our contact page.
Questions brand owners ask about positioning a product brand
What is brand positioning for a product brand?
It is the written reason a buyer should pick your product over similar ones, made of 4 decisions: who it is for, what it stands against, what it is called and what it must never say.
Do positioning claims need evidence?
Objective ones do. Under the UK CAP Code, marketers must hold documentary evidence for claims consumers are likely to regard as objective before publication. Obvious puffery is treated differently.
Should we position against a named competitor?
It is allowed in the UK under specific conditions, including a fair, verifiable comparison of products meeting the same needs and no denigration. Many brands do better stating their own difference.
Why does the name belong to positioning?
Because a name that only describes the product is hard to protect. The USPTO notes that creative and unique trademarks are more effective and easier to protect than descriptive ones.
Can we buy positioning without a new identity?
Yes. At MarkaWorks positioning, naming and the differentiation frame can be delivered on their own, and some clients decide on the identity later.
The 4 decisions that make a position, the evidence each claim needs before it is published, a name that can be protected, and how the position becomes a pack and a page.
More brands we brought to life:
